no contest
here was a photo duel i just could not win. despite having my big camera AND my little camera in action at the same time i could not compete.
The rules of photo duels clearly state that in the absence of two time stamped still pictures:
* professional camera beats amateur camera
* video camera always beats still camera
* heaviest camera wins
* biggest camera wins
* extra points for flash and extended eye piece
so he won even though he was wearing his tie over his shoulder.
If I may I would like to challenge the "video camera always beats still camera" rule.
Last weekend my wonderful but puny Sony DCR-HC40E camcorder was outranked dramatically by beefy SLR devices with telephoto lenses, not to mention several photo-journalists with unipods and massive beige mega-zoom thingummies which must've weighed a tonne (none of which I felt safe enough to film).
Or do the rules not apply in the order you've quoted them? Some clarification is required methinks!